Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Joel, Lets see, you have two bodies and you WONDER whether you need them both? Of course you don't. Leicas don't really need back-ups since they continue to work under very adverse conditions. One lens (35-50mm) and one body is the minimum system. After that, I'd add a 90mm for portraits, subject isolation, and (relatively) close-ups. After that, a second body is probably more useful (to me) than more glass. I once had one M3 body and a few lenses. When I stepped off a rock and fell 30 feet into a crevasse with my leica, I decided it deserved a CLA and sent it away. After a week I experienced disquieting withdrawel symptoms. I coped by going to the local dealer just to look at his leicas. He had lots of new stuff and two old M3s. I looked, reminded myself that I didn't need and couldn't afford another body, left, and then quickly slipped back in and bought the oldest one... Now I use the second body all the time and never consider it a backup. It holds another lens, or different film, or film when the other body is empty. But you already have two bodies and don't feel the same way... How can that be? Some difference between your two bodies must have made you value the M4 less than another lens. Sell the M4-p! Get the lens. Then buy another M6. - ---------- > > Joel House wrote: > > What would you prefer to have? A backup Leica camera or more Leica lenses? I > have an M6 and an M4-P. I could use a couple of lenses, but I can't really > afford to buy any unless I sell the M4-p. During my professional days I > would have never considered shooting without a backup body. > > What would you do? > > What minimal system lenses would you consider? I mainly do journalistic > style pictures of family and some travel.