Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Film Loading thread
From: Paul Chefurka <Paul_Chefurka@pmc-sierra.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:28:56 -0700

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

- ------_=_NextPart_001_01BEDEA7.3741128E
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

> I have never really had any problems with my M4-2 for 
> loading.
<snip>
> However, ask me about the Nikon F3 spool.

Exactly the same experience here.  I can load my M4 twice as fast and twice
as certainly as my F3HP.  I still fumble a bit with the M3, but even that
has gotten into the F3 time-frame.  The M4's and later are a cinch to load
if you don't fuss over them.

- ------_=_NextPart_001_01BEDEA7.3741128E
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>RE: [Leica] Film Loading thread</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; I have never really had any problems with my =
M4-2 for </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; loading.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&lt;snip&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; However, ask me about the Nikon F3 =
spool.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Exactly the same experience here.&nbsp; I can load my =
M4 twice as fast and twice as certainly as my F3HP.&nbsp; I still =
fumble a bit with the M3, but even that has gotten into the F3 =
time-frame.&nbsp; The M4's and later are a cinch to load if you don't =
fuss over them.</FONT></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
- ------_=_NextPart_001_01BEDEA7.3741128E--