Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Interesting test performed by the British Journal of Photography. I did a test here locally, at one of the busiest airports in the World, using my unexposed film. I ran a roll through, as it sat in my bag on the conveyor belt. Just one pass, in one end and out the other. Later that afternoon I processed both that roll and an unexposed roll from the same batch Pro Pack; in the same tub, using exactly the same developer and chemistry times. The X-rayed roll tested 'darker' with a photographic densitometer than the 'normal' roll. By darker I mean it was 'fogged'. By a certain percentage point that I've now forgotten (enough, as I remember, to equal about a half stop exposure). I didn't test all films, just my main film (the one I use all the time). Wasn't sponsored by any company or publication, just had a need to know. Mostly because I'd heard both sides of the argument; it does and it doesn't affect film. I'd also read some reports that vacillated between the two poles. Best way to know, for shure, was to test it personally. Last year I was forced, almost at gunpoint, to run a small bag of film through an X-ray machine in a fourth world country. That batch was smoked (by at least two stops!). Lucky for me I had a bunch of good stock stashed in a duffel going through baggage check (where they don't bother X-raying!) I won't let my film (either exposed or unexposed) go through the X-ray machines. I carry a purple Crown Royal bag with draw string (have as many as four to choose from, different sizes), hang that on the side of my camera bag- hand it over for hand checking as I go through the metal detector- never a problem, they're more than happy to comply. And anyway, I get to enjoy the Crown Royal in the process of acquiring the bags. It's a good trade off.