Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ------_=_NextPart_001_01BED9CC.F93AE0B6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > Since when did the M3 have a 100% viewfinder? > > Dan C. > > >That would indicate that there will be no 100% Viewfinder ala M3? It's usually called a ".91" viewfinder, but the term 91% is also technically correct. It's unfortunate that the SLR chauvinists have appropriated that terminology for the viewfinder's coverage, rather than its magnification. Paul Chefurka - ------_=_NextPart_001_01BED9CC.F93AE0B6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 5.5.2448.0"> <TITLE>RE: [Leica] Special Edition M6s</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Since when did the M3 have a 100% = viewfinder?</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Dan C.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >That would indicate that there will be no = 100% Viewfinder ala M3?</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>It's usually called a ".91" viewfinder, but = the term 91% is also technically correct.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>It's unfortunate that the SLR chauvinists have = appropriated that terminology for the viewfinder's coverage, rather = than its magnification.</FONT></P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Paul Chefurka</FONT> </P> </BODY> </HTML> - ------_=_NextPart_001_01BED9CC.F93AE0B6--