Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mikiro Mori wrote: > > Bud, Nathan, and Horst, Thank you very much for your description and > advice. Now I am getting some idea how good they are and how they differ. > > I first started using Leica with R six years ago and have gradually shifted > to M. Now that I use R only occasionally, I am downsizing my R system to, > hopefully, one body with a 60 macro. Then I came up with an idea of using > SL/SL2. If I do not have to carry two bodies and four lenses, they are very > good! I have played with my friend's SL only briefly, but its feel was > better than my RE and R6.2 which are excellent tools but do not make me > cheerful as M's do. > > I hope I will have chance to "meet" nice SL/SL2. > > Thanks again. > > Mikiro What about one body with the 100 macro? More logical in some way's in doing what the SLR does well. Especially the SLR in question: Leica R. Plus the lens is more legendary though pricey. Sorry if I missed the beginning of the thread and that was already discussed. Like you I will always be a 99% M type of person with my 35mm. The Letter M works for me! Mark Rabiner