Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 35 Summicron M vs R
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 08:44:11 -0700

Three cams vs. none, built-in hood, vs. no built-in hood, large diameter
bayonet mount vs. small diameter mount. You cannot jam all of that auto
diaphragm/hood/mount stuff into a physically small lens.

Jim


At 11:15 AM 7/12/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Can anyone explain why the 35 Summicron M (pre-ASPH) is so compact when 
>compared to the 35 Summicron R lens. On my M system, the 35 is a favorite 
>lens because it is smaller than the 50. Whereas on my R system, I shy away 
>from the 35 because of its relatively large size when compared to the 50mm R.
>
>I looked at the element diagrams of these lenses, and while the 50's are
very 
>similar in the M & R, the 35's look like a completely different design.
>
>Any thoughts on this subject appreciated.
>
>Steve Brauner
>