Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Does a second body significantly increase the number of good pictures? {snip} This is a question I've been asking myself. The answer: it may not increase the number of good pictures but it does increase my flexibility. For instance: Color print in one, color slide in the other. Color print in one, B&W in the other B&W in one, infrared in the other I think you get the idea. I could buy a lot of film for what I have just paid for a second body, but cost isn't the whole story. What about having a camera at hand, already loaded with the film I want, rather than taking the time to unload one and reload it? What about being able to handle a single subject with two different films simulataneously? And, although you may not necessarily feel it's prudent, simply having a backup. No camera is foolproof and nothing works forever. Leica's MTBF may be very high, but that still no guarantee that a body won't fail right out of the box. I went to Yellowstone on a motorcycle trip a couple of years ago with one camera, a Retina IIIC, to save space and weight. Three exposures into my first roll the shutter froze up and didn't work for the rest of the trip. Almost two years ago I made a conscious decision to trust all my 35mm photography to a Leica rangefinder of one type or another. That is limit enough. I'm no longer willing to risk loosing pictures of a hard-earned vacation simply because I only have a single body to take. Dave