Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 6/28/99 3:02:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time, mrabiner@concentric.net writes: << But I agree with Dan's dislike of the "Thin Elmarit" but feel its problems go beyond flare and that no lens shade could cure. Are we talking about the Tele-Elmarit here? I think we are. >> I've heard from so many people who dislike this lens. I used the "fat" one for a number of years and the "thin" one for quite a few more, long after I'd gotten a Summicron (which I eventually sold--the only Leica lens I've ever sold--for an Elmarit-M). In fact even now when I'm going to a "landscape destination" carrying my 6x9 field camera I always pack a little Leica kit which includes an M42 and the 90 thin tele-elmarit because I only need one set of filters for the 35-50-90-135 and all those '70s lenses are smaller than the current ones even if they're not the latest optics. I have gotten some really sharp, contrasty shots with that lens. Of course, I have to remember that I almost never shoot it wider than f8, usually f11 or 16. DT