Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hear! Hear! The reason I switched from the R7 to the SL was that I can see the entire image in the SL, and it is brighter. The R7, an admittedly fine camera, was bothersome in that I had to do a lot of squirming and roly-poly gyrations, squinting and making ugly faces to see the image, AND read the imformation display! Couldn't use it at the theme park- people thought I was a ride/exhibit, and started to line up! Dan (Squinting in the light) - ----- Original Message ----- From: <InfinityDT@aol.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 7:36 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Senseless design > In a message dated 6/23/99 10:33:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > mrabiner@concentric.net writes: > > << The M5 bombs so they say "why not just stick a meter where the self > timer is on the M4 it just might work?" I call that the kind of inspired > thinking which has put most of us here on this list. It's called the M6. > The idea worked you could put it mildly. I bought a little self timer > thing. Never used it. > Never had a camera closer to my heart than my M6. I guess self timers > are not a big thing with me. > Mark Rabiner >> > > Too bad some of that inspired thinking couldn't have resulted in a > high-eyepoint viewfinder. I wager to say that a good chunk of people in the > M6's market wear glasses. Not everyone can wear contacts or feels like > getting Lasik'd. Correction eyepieces are no solution if you have a really > strong prescription and have to put glasses on and off to compose or to see > the camera controls. The 28mm frame in my M6 is useless to me (the 35 is > barely visible). At least I can buy a Leica 28mm finder. The .85 model I'd > like, I'd have to pay a fortune for a "collectible" 35 finder and give up > one-window focus/framing which is more necessary with the 35. Of all the > things people want Leica to do to the M6 that would require major redesigns, > the HP viewfinder eyepiece wouldn't. > > DT > > DT