Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: MLU
From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 11:12:22 -0700
 
><snip>
>              My original posting, which was edited here, appears completely
> out of context.  My point was that if it were true that pro-quality SLR's
> don't need MLU (i.e. the F100) then the F5, being Nikon's flagship, should
> therefore need it *even less*.  Yet, Nikon sees fit to have MLU on the F5,
> therefore putting their claim that the F100 doesn't need it under great
> suspicion.
> DT

That's because No serious photographer would believe such a hollow claim
and use an SLR without MLU.
Especially a commercial photographer.
The proper milieu being very important.
Mark :-) Rabiner