Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: RE: AF & auto exposure
From: m037iu00@cwcom.net
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 16:27:03 +0100

- --------------D15EBFCA807CACDE82FB9393
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

if the leica is a quill pen, what's the F5, a bic?
guy

Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: A Mont Blanc

================================
Peter,
Your choice of Mont Blanc sits easily with me, I have heard they are very
expensive, break down quite readily and provide erratic ink flow, often
failing spectacularly by flooding an owners pockets with ink as well.

Jem
(whose Parker 51 seems to be the epitome of an M-Leica)

- --------------D15EBFCA807CACDE82FB9393
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML>
<I>if the leica is a quill pen, what's the F5, a bic?</I>
<BR><I>guy</I><I></I>

<P><I>Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: A Mont Blanc</I>

<P>================================
<BR>Peter,
<BR>Your choice of Mont Blanc sits easily with me, I have heard they are
very expensive, break down quite readily and provide erratic ink flow,
often failing spectacularly by flooding an owners pockets with ink as well.

<P>Jem
<BR>(whose Parker 51 seems to be the epitome of an M-Leica)</HTML>

- --------------D15EBFCA807CACDE82FB9393--