Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well said, Jim. I agree that it would be folly for Leica to produce an AF system simply for the sake of it. There would have to be some very unique design features to sway existing users. AF assist would indeed be helpful, particularly with short lenses on the R cameras. I must admit that since using the M6s over the last couple or years, my willingness to tolerate manually focusing wide angle lenses on an SLR is limited. Your question "where is the market?" is spot on. Even if Leica produced a contemporary AF system, there's just no way they would be able to achieve the market penetration of the major Japanese manufacturers without losing some of thier identity. Going mainstream would mean competing head-on with CanNikMinTax on price and I just don't see that happening. That market demands huge R&D, rapid development cycles, frequent model updates, and massive advertising campaigns. Like any small company, Leica is probably better off working thier high-end niche. Along with Contax, they pretty much own it. AF lenses will necessarily mean lighter construction and I can't see them alienating existing customers. Leica gear is so expensive, most people can't afford to just start over. Some kind of AF body ala Contax AX seems more likely. For some jobs, though, you can't beat a fast AF system. Next week, I'm doing a story for MSNBC on white water rafting, and I'll be shooting on the boat with an EOS1 + 17-35 in an EWA bag with alot of fill flash. From the shore, the EOS will be ideal for action shots with the 300/2.8, predictive AF, and a 5fps motor. My Leica gear would be totally out of place here. Does the R8 motor even exist yet? Cheers, - --Jim Laurel P.S. It's nice to be back on the LUG and seeing some of the familiar names still around!