Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]PB, Oh, shucks, now you've ruined it for me. All that time that I was so happy with my 40 M_Rokkor, I shouldn't have been! <g> Ben - --- "Paul C. Brodek" <pcb@iac.co.jp> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > From messages I've seen on this list, it looks like the optical design > of both the 40/2.0 and 90/4.0 M-Rokkor (CLE versions) differ from the > previous Leica-designed CL versions. > > Regards, > > PB > > > On Fri, 30 Apr 1999 07:10:25 -0700 (PDT), Benjamin Tuason > <bentua@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >I presume it is well known, based the number of times I've read about it. Whether it is a fact > or > >not, I don't know. > >Ben > > > >--- Lucien <lucien@ubi.edu> wrote: > >> > >> > >> debugger wrote: > >> > >> > I think it is well-known that the 40 summicron and the 40 rokkor are of the > >> > same design, the rokkor being manufactured by Minolta to Leica's specs. > >> > >> Ben, > >> > >> Is that a fact ? > >> > >> Lucien > > > Paul C. Brodek > Kobe, Japan > pcb@iac.co.jp > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com