Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>This question was asked of me, at my last Leica Workshop. Perhaps I could >get some feedback from the LUG. > >"As a Leica user and enthusiast, and in keeping with the optical quality >I'm accustomed to, what medium format camera would you recommend should I >wish to augment my 35mm Leica system with a roll film system?" After much thought and pondering over this question, I think the best MF camera would probably be a German Rollei TLR with 80/2.8 Planar lens which has superb sharpness, nice contrast, and the focal length responsible for 80% of MF prize winning pictures. Moreover, it is also light, rugged, simple to use, easy to service, relatively cheaper to buy and if well taken care of will last another lifetime. The lack of interchangeable lens is not really a great disadvantage when you consider that the "normal lens" (just like the 50mm summicron on your leica) can be used to take a majority of pics. My friends who have used the Mamiya 6 or 7 were initially elated by the optics, the MTF curves, the "normal camera type" feel and configuration. A good many were not so excited after using the camera for some time and I started to get beedback like, "I think the camera is not as sharp as before". I suspect Mamiyas are great to begin with but the quality of the workmanship does not meet the demands of years and years of use. My impression about Hasselblad and Rollei is that these two are built to last and withstand rigorous use without faltering. Hence this quality is reflected in their prices in the used market. I suspect the same is reflected in Leica prices to some extent. In other words, the used stuff is still quality stuff when you buy Hassies, Rollies and Leicas as compared to Mamiyas, Bronicas, Pentaxes, Ns and Cs. Dan K.