Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Binoculars, Old and New
From: "Robert G. Stevens" <robsteve@istar.ca>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 18:03:47 -0300

Marc:

You sure do have your opinions.  The Fujinons I have are their top
Binocular, model MTSRC maybe, and are better than most of the Zeiss and
Leica Binnoculars when independantly tested.  I think they sell for under
$1000.  I got mine used for $350. Pentax BTW are very good as you have said
and available in Canada.  The camera store I frequent sells a lot of the
Pentax Binoculars to the Canadian Navy and the Coast Guard, Halifax having
the second largest military base in Canada based on personel, only exceeded
in size by Ottawa.  The Pentax are reasonably priced, much less than the
Zeiss and Leica.

Regards,

Robert


 the At 03:57 AM 4/11/99 -0400, you wrote:
>At 04:20 PM 4/11/99 -0300, Robert G Stevens wrote:
>>Marc:
>>
>>Have you looked through any of the Fujinon 7x50 Marine binoculars?  I have
>>a set and the manual says they exceed other brands in light gathering
>>ability including the best Ziess 7x50.  
>
>Yes, I have looked through them.  I hope I will never be so embarrassed
>again.  The manufacturer is known in astronomical circles as "Fuzzinon" for
>a reason!
>
>Fujinon produces cheap junk and charges a lot for it.  Swift does a better
>job of matching price to quality.  And we shan't discuss those overpriced
>humiliations Nikon markets.
>
>But, for the best stuff, you have to Pay Big Bucks.  There is no escaping
>the economic realities.  Pentax makes some World Class Optics, but they do
>not sell these outside of Japan, as they would sell for 120% of Zeiss or
>Leica prices in the US, and they have conceded the quality optics market
>here to the Germans and US firms (Leupold, for instance, comes to mind) for
>that reason.  I have seen some of Pentax' better gear, and it is wonderful.
> But, it costs a bundle!
>
>Avoid Fuzzinon.  There is an old saw which runs along the lines of, "the
>agony of horrid performance persists long after the exultation of a low
>price", and this applies to both Nikon and Fujinon.  Their best gear is
>just not up to the price they charge, and their lower-end gear can be
>bettered by off-brand firms like Docter or Swarovski for less money.
>
>Marc
>
>
>
>msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
>Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!
>
>
>
>
>