Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>One can devote so much more time into >>composing when one does not have the hassle of calculating exposure, >>focussing, film speed setting, film loading and rewinding, exposure >>compensation, flash metering, etc etc etc. > >Wait a minute. How do you avoid film loading? <snip> > >How often do you have to set film speed? This is hardly a burden. <snip> > >As long as it doesn't take away from the functionality of the camera, or >the size, or speed, then I'm fer it. Electronic shutter, great! <snip> >I suspect >they're designing a totally new camera, if at all. And from what has been >said here on the list before, I'm beginning to doubt that. The future of AF >at Leica is the R series. > >Eric Welch While film loading is an essential part of handling any camera, I find that film loading on my F90 or G2 or even my P&S a breeze compared to my M6. With the former I always get frame #1 after a short whirrrrrr. The baseplate on the M6 is a pain, the flap at the back offers at most a peek, and when the film is wound I have to consciously eye the rewind knob to confirm that the film is truly running. Except for the challenge to my dexterity everytime I load the M6, and for the supposedly stronger construction of the M body (as contributed by the baseplate design), I find the leica M film loading design terribly archaic. I welcome the DX system as I have a tendency to forget to reset the film speed on my M6 especially when I change to a different film speed. It is so nice to just pop in the film and know that the ISO setting is taken care of. Electronic shutters are far far more accurate than the majority of mechanical shutters. I am sure that when Leica goes AF in their SLR series, they will regain a sizeable market share. Dan K.