Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As a LUG member, I frequently attempt to answer those questions that are within my interest area. Do I always know the answer to all of these questions? No. But since it is in an area of interest, I spend the time and do research in order to find the answer. Where do I do the research? On the Internet and in my library. In my library, I have twenty years of Photo Techniques (Darkroom Photography) and Leica Photographie International. All Jobo and DMAX newsletters, all of Patrick Dignan Photo Chemistry newsletters and publications, several years of Viewfinder and Rangefinder, plus at least 150 books on various and all aspects of photography. I rely heavily upon periodicals for answers to my own, and others questions. I have published numerous technical articles in computer design journals. EDN, Computer Design, etc. I can tell you from experience, that the editors of every periodical that I have ever dealt with (photo or computer) was a stickler for accuracy. Why? Because people will read these articles and make decisions based upon their content. A great way to lose credibility, as a writer, and as a periodical, is to disseminate inaccurate information. The "editor" of any periodical, which publishes information about a product, method, or process, is bound by ethics, to do everything possible to insure that the information being published, is accurate. There is nothing worse than researching for an answer, finding it, stating it, only to find out that what you have just researched and said, is wrong. The editor cannot pass the buck. The credibility of the publication is at risk. Once stained, always tarnished. I have not received the current issue of Viewfinder. I cannot comment on the articles in question. My entire premise is that technical based periodicals, that are revered as a source of technical information, should have a "primary" goal if insuring that the information presented is indeed true and accurate. There are no excuses. None. Make a fool out of me, I'll never open your door again. Jim