Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Is there any way you could shoot a roll, not rewind it, and unload the un-rewound film in the darkroom? Perhaps this could tell you if the problem is with the rewinding of the film? Not sure what the ramifications of unloading un-rewound film on the M6, but couldn't it give you a good indication on at least 50% of the frames? Just curious, Paul >From leica-users-admin@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Mon Mar 8 06:29:13 1999 >Received: (from majordom@localhost) > by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) id GAA07600; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 06:28:50 -0800 (PST) >Received: from ULVACS.ULV.EDU (ULVACS.ULV.EDU [206.16.20.2]) > by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA07595; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 06:28:49 -0800 (PST) >From: COLBYG@ULV.EDU >Received: from ULV.EDU by ULV.EDU (PMDF V5.1-12 #19861) > id <01J8KSXQXTSW9N42NH@ULV.EDU> for leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; Mon, > 8 Mar 1999 06:28:47 PST >Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 06:18:39 -0800 (PST) >Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: M6 scratching film >In-reply-to: "Your message dated Sun, 07 Mar 1999 22:51:36 -0800" > <199903080650.WAA03457@hh.alink.net> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Message-id: <01J8KTBTK9Y49N42NH@ULV.EDU> >MIME-version: 1.0 >Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >References: <s6e3c5cc.086@minters.com.au> <01J8KAPKT8189N43D4@ULV.EDU> >Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > >Hi, Jim, > >> I personally doubt if your cameras are scratching film. The more film used, >> the smoother everything gets. It's physics... > > Makes sense to me, but the scratching is undeniable (I can see it on >the film, in some cases; I can't see it but it scans...on more than one >scanner...in other cases). > >> I personally would suspect dirty film canisters. The light seal fuzzy >> material can collect grit very easily. Where and how do you store your >> film... > > In every case the film was not stored. It was purchased fresh, removed >from the box and plastic container moments before it was loaded into the >camera. > It's showing up on all kinds of film, too. Tri-X, D3200, P3200, Astia. >I first noticed it on Astia, where it seems to have been most prounouced. > >> Do you reload cartridges? > > No. > >> Anyway... look at things other than the camera itself. > > Good advice. That's why I wrote to you. All the film is hand-processed >by me. Loaded onto steel reels and into 16- or 32-ounce steel tanks or the >Wing-Lynch machine, there isn't a chance for the film to be scratched from any >source *except* the camera... > >> I have, over the years, scratched film. It never ever was the camera. >> Always an external reason. > > The only thing that I can think of is dust in the camera. If the dust >gets onto the film within the camera it could scratch the film as it's rewound >and slides against itself in the cassette...although that seems mildly unlikely >to me. > What bothers me most is that I've scratched film too, described same as >you, but *never* to this extent and by my long experience with the Nikons, >never with the Nikons. > Our students use all kinds of cameras (but no Leicas), they process >their film on plastic and steel reels, in tanks and in the Wing-Lynch machine. >They are notoriously sloppy, but scanning on the same equipment as me we don't >see scratches from them! They load and process Tri-X and various types of >factory load C-41. > The only combination that scratches the film is my Leica M6's. Really. > >-Gary > colbyg@ulv.edu > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com