Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I did not imply you as in specificall you, I guess it should read, if one rates it at 80.... E-mail is a pain since there are no voice inflections to realize terms. But alas, English with 3x the words of most other languages is easy, once you get past words like Ka-Nife.... - -----Original Message----- From: Jim Brick [mailto:jimbrick@photoaccess.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 1999 9:35 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] RE: Re: Re: velvia and Taj Mahal At 09:20 AM 3/3/99 -0800, you wrote: >Jim, > >Kodachrome is a true 64, if you rate it at 80 you just make it more >contrasty. > Peter, I've never rated K64 at anything but 64. Where did you get the idea that I rated it at 80? I simply stated that Kodachrome thrives on slight underexposure. I said this because this has been its reputation. I didn't say that I did this. I don't. Jim