Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Regarding Leica lenses testing well...Take a look at the latest Photodo.com test of the 28-70. They seem to think it's a hunk of coal based on the 2.8 score they gave it.......Pretty suprising considering the very good performance of several Canon short zooms on the same website. While some of what Walt says about testing being a bit esoteric may be right, there is no ignoring such a tank result in a lens that lists for as much as two of my first cars! Objective lens testing provides the same service to the consumer as any other product review. The consumer should read more than one, and decide on the value of the item for themselves. Professional criticism is a valuable tool for educating consumers. Without it I would have plunked down the full fare for the movie "Cabin Boy"! >Boy, 300+ messages .... mostly from lens test vs. usage. > >Anyway, I think tests and usage each have a place. Most Leica lenses test >very well. I don't think there has been a Leica lens someone has really >trashed (well, except maybe the Hektor). Testing can show the value of a >lens at various apertures and save people a lot of money when deciding on a >lens. >OTOH, using a lens is where the rubber meets the road. Does anyone >remembers the Nikkor 38-76mm zoom? The one Nikon apologized about because it >was not a sharp optic. It tested lousy. But still sold in large numbers to >many PJs and others in the 60s because it offered something they wanted, a >short zoom! Even if it was not as tack sharp as say the 50mm F1.4 Nikkor, >they found it usable. > >For Leica we have talked about the Noctilux. While it TESTS OK wide open, >it is better stopped down. Those that realize this and use the Noctilux for >its intention are happy with it at F1. Those that use F8 most of the time >can look at the "test data" and perhaps decide on a Summicron-M Asph which >may test better at F8, so they can save $$$ and maybe buy LUG, something >else :-). > >Peter K > >PS If Erwin is speaking as Mr. Spock... Does that mean Eric is Dr. McCoy, >a.k.a. "Bon ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com