Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Here's a quote I have in my notebook, by photographer Michael Kenna on technological advances in photography, copied from a magazine interview: "There will always be technological advances -- every day there's something new. However, as the world around me accelerates, my tendency is to slow down and look for "center." I do not see many good reasons for jumping aboard this [digital] bandwagon. I find the simpler the technology, the more freedom I have to look within myself. Exquisite music still comes from very old instruments... Old and new can live side-by-side in peaceful coexistence; one does not replace the other, the repertoire just expands. I suggest, though, that if we strive for perfect, digitally processed images and prints, the further away we might get from our fallibility and accident-prone humanity. I believe it is important to allow for accident-prone humanity. I believe it is important to allow for accident and not be too controlling." To me this says it all about the value of the Leica "M" and just a couple of lenses and B&W film. If I was a pro and had to worry about bringing home the bacon, I, too, would go for all the technological help I could get. But if I did have to do that, I don't think photography would be that much fun anymore. I think the "M" is the ultimate amateur camera (in the very best sense of that word). And also in that sense, less is more, IMHO. A take-off on a quote by novelist David Lodge, also from my notebook: "Most people in photography are perfectionists. They may be shooting crap, printing crap, exhibiting crap, but they try and make it *perfect* crap." Bruce Feldman Warsaw, Poland