Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]he he he.... Ask Will Von Dauster if I'll argue in person.....hehehe. Walt On Mon, 22 Feb 1999 11:49:53 -0800 Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com> wrote:Ask > E-mail is a strange form of communications. It spans the globe in > microseconds. There isn't any consciousness or consequences involved. It > really doesn't matter what is said, or how it is worded, folks will put > their own slant on it anyway. They will read whatever they want, between > the lines. Different folks. Different cultures. Different ethics. Different > interpretations. There is no face connected. It is just a bunch of text > appearing on a computer monitor. Innocuous, not Innocuous? Depends upon who > you are. > > You are in a hurry to get to work. You are late for a meeting. So you are > driving a little faster than normal. You take a few opportunities and > slip-in front of other folks (cut them off), when there really wasn't > enough room. A few horns honk, lights flash. But you ignore them and > continue. These are just pieces of metal. No face. After all, I'm right. I > have an important meeting to get to. > > You arrive at work, and as you are getting out of your car, one of the > folks you cut-off, pulls into the lot and parks near you. You exchange > glances, but you hurry in to the meeting. There is a face, but it's gone now. > > You sit down. Made it! > > Then the door opens, and who walks in... the person you cut-off just ten > minutes ago. Now their is a consciousness behind that previous action. It's > no longer a hunk of metal. It's a face. You start having a "hot flash". > This is a very important new client. And now there is a consequence behind > that previous action. > > What to do? > > Will you do it again? > > As soon as there are consequences. As soon as there is a consciousness. As > soon as there is a face. The rules change. > > At the LUG meeting with Leica at Photokina. At the LUG meeting here in Palo > Alto. At the other LUG meetings around the globe. Did we talk to each other > in antagonistic terms? Were we rude? Did we argue beyond the point of no > return? > > No. Never. > > We had consequences, consciousness, and faces. Smiling faces. Happy faces. > Fun faces. We talked and talked, looked at equipment, looked at slides, and > talked some more. We didn't want to leave. > > We talked with our mouths, eyes, and gestures. Not with only our fingers, > in total isolation. > > We should all think about the possibility of meeting each other. When you > type that next message, imagine having to meet the people you are speaking > to, after you push send. > > Sometimes the best message, is no message at all. And sometimes the best > response, is no response at all. > > Have a great day all, > > Jim > > PS... my philosophies are quite often self-realized...