Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>On 19-02-1999 17:22 Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: > >>No test on the Leica 400mm F2.8 yet. I bet there are so many being bought >>by the LUGs that Leica cannot supply a test sample to the magazine. > >Peter: > >Why do you keep delivering such unnecessary and "poisonous" remarks to >this group? >I would like to ask you to refrain from doing so any further. >Thank you. > Pascal, I thought Peter's remark rather humorus...but then I have a VERY sarcastic sense of humor. I would rather think people intend statements to be taken as a joke than get angry over something probably meant to be harmless. Lord if everyone I said sarcastic things to got mad at me I would be talking to myself. Ok, I'm off to eat lunch by myself since no one at the office will go with me..... BTW it does not surprise the 400 Canon beats the Nikon...My old FD 400 2.8 is simply one of the best long lenses I have ever used. Harrison McClary http://people.delphi.com/hmphoto Preview my book: http://www.volmania.com mail: mcclary@iname.com