Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I guess it all comes down to what produces the best results for what we're > > trying to do? Just as photography put engravers out of business of doing > pictures for newspapers in the late 19th century, and 35mm killed Rollei > and 4x5 at newspapers, maybe digital will too. But the art of photography > will be with us for many years, simply because the absolute image quality > will stay ahead of digital, or film manufacturers will go out of business. > > Eric Welch > St. Joseph, MO > You are, of course, correct. The question then becomes whether or not digital equipment will be developed to the point that we can argue over the subtle differences lying within the technology just as we argue over the subtle differences between Leica lenses. It does seem that this group tends to view digital technology in-- pardon me-- binary terms. "There is digital technology, it is good." "There is digital technology, it is bad." In forty years, will photographers wax nostalgic over the characteristics of the long lost Digilux? Buzz Hausner