Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Joe,Bob, Thib: Osterloh in his Leica M book compares the M5 and M6 metering systems. Accordingly,and here I copy his Table from p. 41: M6 M5 Diameter of measuring spot 12mm 8.5mm Measuring range(cd/m^2) 0.25-32000 0.06-32000 Exposure values 1--18 -1--18 Clearly, the CdS meter of the M5 is more sensitive than that of the M6. In addition, the M5 meter qualifies as a semi-spot meter. Moreover, the shutter speed can be read on an analog scale in the finder. The problem with the M5 is the 140grams of extra weight(M6--560gm, M5--700gm) and larger size(M6--138x77mm, M5--155x84mm). Although, I haven't heard any complaints about the unusual shape and weight of the R8 compared to the previous R's(R4 through R7). Summing up, I concur that the M5 is the finest M body from the wizards of Wetzlar. regards, Andrew Jordan