Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan You wrote: >>I noticed a fair number of Leicaflex SL's for sale at cheapo prices. These were decent user cameras for 200-250. I asked why they seemed so cheap and the dealer said the market has dropped out on these cameras. << I think the demand for older manual focus camera equipment is really waning. I paid $200 for my SL last summer. It's in very good condition, save a number engraved on the bottom. It's a neat old camera, but I use it because it's the only R body I have right now. I still have a handful of mercury batteries (I used to leave my Hasselblad meter prism on all the time, so I stocked up). But the SL meter is only accurate enough for neg film, and I think even those days are numbered. I'll use it as long as the shutter is accurate. Still, I'd much prefer an R6.2, R7 or R8, even given the cost difference. I don't own a newer body because I haven't yet decided to move to Leica R. I had a recent conversation with a local dealer about used equipment. He said that used Leica R -- even some of the more recent stuff -- can sit on the shelf for a long time. Same goes for Nikon F2s and Canon F1s. But put out an N90s or A2e and it's gone in a heartbeat. You don't need to lower the price to move it. Dave