Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tom: I've owned one for several years, bought used from a friend in Stockholm. It's a wonderful lens -- great depth of field, good contrast, and very sharp. Except for the "cleaning marks" on the front surface, which don't seem to matter unless one gets bright sun aiming too directly into the field of view, it would be my favorite lens for the M. My Summilux uses the Series VII filters and shades. This gets one into the tiny nooks and crannies of Leica lore -- otherwise omniscient Leica salespeople look at it and swear that the front housing on the lens has been replaced with some sort of aftermarket component. The result is that I have no shade or filters to fit the lens, and I use a recent Leica plastic cap that (almost) wedges into the outer flange of the lens housing. Bothered by these restrictions on the Summilux and lacking a really good 50mm for the M (I have a LTM Summarit 1.5 that I have used with an adaptor), I bought a Tri-Elmar last fall. I haven't used the Summilux since then. I will probably sell it at some point. Dick Baznik __________ At 09:04 PM 2/7/99 -0600, you wrote: >Surely someone has opinions of and advise concerning pre ASPH 35 Summilux ? > >tom > > >