Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Oops... I missed the pre. I would choose the Summicron. thanks, Jim >Jim, > >I think he said "pre" ASPH, not the ASPH which I believe you are >lauding.. > >I am not really familiar with the 35mm Sumilux except to say in my case >I felt the Summicron was 'better' and didn't need the stop. > >Dennis > > >Jim Brick wrote: >> >> I personally believe that it is the finest 35mm lens Leica makes. Go to >> http://www.imx.nl/photosite/leica/m/lenses/pages/l11879.html if you want to >> read more. >> >> Jim >> >> At 09:04 PM 2/7/99 -0600, you wrote: >> >Surely someone has opinions of and advise concerning pre ASPH 35 Summilux ? >> > >> >tom >> > > At 11:15 PM 2/7/99 -0500, you wrote: >Er, Jim, didn't he say ``pre ASPH''? Is that really your opinion of the >earlier lens? I know some are quite fond of using its major-league coma >wide open to pictorial ends, but... > >At 07 Feb 1999 19:23:31 -0800, Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> wrote: > >> I personally believe that it is the finest 35mm lens Leica makes. Go to >> http://www.imx.nl/photosite/leica/m/lenses/pages/l11879.html if you want to >> read more. > >[in response to:] > >> >Surely someone has opinions of and advise concerning pre ASPH 35 Summilux ? >> > > > -Jeff M. >