Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lucian Chis wrote: > > I am sure you meant Zeiss as the manufacturer of lenses, as Leitz is > officially dead! > > Lucian > > On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Mark Rabiner wrote: > > > The Contax 645 came to Portland Oregon and I went downtown to check it > > out. A beautiful camera with impressive mirror dampening and autofocus > > backed up by a full set Leitz made in Japan Optics which I'm sure would > > be hard to beat except: > > they looked like cheap Vivitar Lenses of the '70s. This made the price > > feel to be a decimal point on the high side. > > I had gotten the impression that they might be priced 1/3 to 1/2 > > comparable Hasselblad or Rollei/Zeiss but the rep read me off a list > > which sounded like the same. All the same they would have to be in the > > hundreds not thousands of dollars as no matter how pristine the glass if > > the whole package looks like junk I don't want any part if it. It is > > inexcusable. Am I a vain guy? > > A bummer experience, I'm ready to check out a comparable Pentex or the > > Fuji Texas autofocus Leica. > > I think autofocus is perfect for MF film and could get me shooting more > > of it. Especially 645 (vest pocket size). > > Mark Rabiner > > Did mean Zeiss of course, what is this about Leitz being dead? Mark Rabiner