Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 2/5/99 7:05:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, mrabiner@concentric.net writes: << TTAbrahams@aol.com wrote: snip Neopan 1600, but it only takes a couple of > hours to process and store this stuff and it can be quickly retrieved and snip Neopan 1600 verses the new Delta 3200? Mark Rabiner >> Mark, I have only shot about 10 rolls of the Delta 3200, not enough for a judgement in my estimation. It does look good, better than the TMZ anyway. The Neopan 1600 has been my standard "low light" film for years. It is very flexible, I usually rate it at 800 and run it through Xtol or, when in doubt, D-76 1:1. I will try to shoot some more Delta 3200 in the next while and try it more extensively. Great with the Noctilux at 3200 ASA "available darkness" shooting. Tom A