Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01BE4EAA.B6DE9580 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have been following the digital vs. continuous tone discussions with = mild interest. I have a question for some of you folks who are more = familiar with the digital processes. What is the best B&W output method = for digital images? Can you obtain output that is like, or as good as a = fine B&W print? What is the cost for good B&W output, if it's avaible at = all? Thanks,=20 Joe Stephenson - ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01BE4EAA.B6DE9580 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3D"Times New Roman">I have been = following the=20 digital vs. continuous tone discussions with mild interest. I have a = question=20 for some of you folks who are more familiar with the digital processes. = What is=20 the best B&W output method for digital images? Can you obtain output = that is=20 like, or as good as a fine B&W print? What is the cost for good = B&W=20 output, if it's avaible at all?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3D"Times New Roman">Thanks, = </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3D"Times New Roman">Joe=20 Stephenson</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01BE4EAA.B6DE9580--