Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hello, For curiosity, is the PAM Britar also a German lens? Once you mentioned that many aftermarket LTM lenses blew the Leitz contemporary lenses into the weeds, what are the several horrid LTM lenses? I recently bought several Nikkor rangefinder lenses (85/2 and 135/3.5) and just got the prints back. To my surprise, they were very good. I would say they were comparable to Leica shots. Thanks, David At 07:12 PM 1/20/99 -0500, you wrote: >At 09:56 PM 1999-01-19, David Young wrote: >> I was browsing some of the dealer's website today to find the 105/4.5 Pam >>Britar at Ken-Mar Camera in New York. The price to my surprise was $495. >>Is it one of the rare beasts or special lenses in Leica SM? Does anyone >>have any info or experience? >>I have never heard that any Leica screw >>mount copies were better than the Leica lenses. > > >The 4.5/105 PAM Britar is a rather mysterious lens; Bob Pins contends it >was the telephoto for the Kardan. It is a nice lens, but is becoming a >collector's piece, rather than a user lens. I've owned several over the >years, and they are solid performers, though slow. I have never >established any of the details of its manufacturer. > >Many aftermarket LTM lenses blew the Leitz contemporary lenses into the >weeds. Certainly, the Zeiss lens line did so across the board, from the >4/2.5cm Topogon to the 4/13.5cm Sonnar, and their clones, the Russian LTM >line continue this tradition. (A 1.5/50 Jupiter-3 performs close to the >level of the current 1.4/50 Summilux and certainly is almost grotesquely >superior to the 1.5/50 Summarit, for instance.) Angenieux, Meyer, Kodak, >Schneider, SOM Berthiot, several Italian houses, Steinheil, Ross, and >Wollensak all made LTM lenses which challenged or exceeded the performance >of Leitz lenses; Canon and Nikon (LET'S NOT GO THERE, he remarks grimly!), >as well as several other Japanese houses did the same. > >It is an interesting topic: there are hundreds and hundreds of different >types of LTM lenses, ranging from superb to horrid. > >And, of course, there IS an outstanding book on the subject! > >Marc > >msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 >Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! > > >