Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search][Eric wrote] > The pictures I have that are taken with 50mm or 55 or 60 mm lenses > have a classic look to them. Kind of like what pictures looked like in the past. Yes. Various LUGers seem to have eliminated the 50mm from their bags and I don't understand why. While I use the 35mm outdoors more than the 50mm, I find the 50mm an ideal short "portrait" lens. If I want to capture a person doing something or with some related items around him/her, a 50mm seems ideal to me. I just looked through a set of photos I took a long while ago of Tibetan refugees in Northern India. Mostly 50mm indoors for individuals, 35mm outside. With a 75mm I have to back off too far; 35mm takes me too close. And then there is the issue of frame lines on an M body. The 50mm is about the easiest frame to use: It's the Goldilocks frame -- not too large, not too small. And the lenses are easy to get, cheap (if one can avoid Nocti fever), and very good! I don't worry much about classic look, but functionally the 50mm is a great tool for me even at f/2 and smaller. Obviously, as with every lens, the 50mm has its limitations and specific uses; but for me the lens produces proportions in photos of individuals in their environments that most nearly match the way we see generally see people -- not the more intimate view of the longer focal length but more "contextualized." - --Gib