Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted is right in assuming that some threads do not excite me, nor my brother. I am now working on a booklet to be published soon, that takes much of my spare time. So my inkling to comment on some topics that pop up on the Lug has to suppressed severely. Happily a bottle of fine Armagnac is within reach on my table where my cat has inched himself between my laptop and some very fat books on you might guess what topics. Two threads however I cannot resist commenting upon. The Noctilux is a great lens and it is unlikely that the wizards from Solms will improve on this one substantially and within economical constraints soon. Of course they might be eventually. I always feel dwarfed (intellectually) after a meeting with these guys and girls. The Noct is neither a lens exclusively designed to be used at full aperture, nor a GP lens for all circumstances. I am always at unease with strong statements that lack arguments or proof. Stopped down the Noct performs very well, but the effect of spherical aberration will soften the fine details and the overall contrast a bit. Still it is way better than as example the Summarit (stopped down). At full aperture the lens has amazing capabilities., which can only be exploited after some acquaintance with its characteristics. Expecting that at f/1.0 this lens will provide very fine detail sparklingly rendered at high speed film is an enigmatic act. The Noct at f/1.0 gives you clear recording of subject outines and flareless rendition of finely graded textures. That is its unique fingerprint. It is very usable at smaller apertures (the 1,2/50 noct aspherical is not) and will fullfill most demands (assuming the ergonomics are aceptable). No it is not a Summicron at smaller apertures. It is a very fine blend of excellent full aperture performance and very good stopped down performance adding some spice here according to its aberration corrections. Please leave any partisanship here. On the discussion of B&W developers and films to match I might offer my own experience. It is very difficult if not impossible to discuss characteristics relating to sensitometric properties without recourse to densitometer readings. The eye is very sensible to small differences in grey tones, but at the same time also very forgiving. In short the eye can be fooled quite easily. I have tested almost all combinations of films and developers on the market (when I was in the Zone system mantra stuff) and I came to this conclusion: developers do differ in producing more or less prominent grain and in acutance effects. As far as gradation goes (the characteristic curve that is) any developer can be tweaked to produce any desired curve form and CI value from any film. The characteristic curve of a film (negative) MUST be matched to the characteristic curve of the print material to be of any value. And we never should forget the influence of the print developer, the enlarger etc. If there is any area where personal experience and taste are of overriding importance it would be B&W processing. Of the zillions of combinations of film/developer/paper/developer 99% will give nearly identical results. The trick is to find a combination that suits ones personal style and taste. For my picture style (optimization of Leica image quality) D100/PanF/APX 25/TechPan and FX39/XTOL and Multigrade IV/Polymax/Multicontrast are preferred combinations. Print developer is Eukobrom or Acugrade. I really doubt if any of the hundreds of recipes being circulated can beat any of these combinations. The upshot is this: trying to find the ultimate is searching for the holy grail: fine adventure stories but without tangible result. Stick to a proven combination and start an intimate relationship with it. It will benefit your photography. There is is simple rule: when results are nearly identical you must differentiate yourself (as a product) to be sellable. From the 50 or more filmdevelopers on the market I would say only five really give results that stand out from the rest. If ever the substitution without effect rule works it is in B&W chemistry. Film chemistry is a science that has converged to an temporarily optimum now. Use it well. Erwin