Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Marc James Small wrote: > > At 02:38 PM 1999-01-04 -0700, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >As your new to this you'll find much background of some of what I'm > >saying and much needed info from Erwin Puts who is on the list and has a > >website. He has an article on the 90's. Opposed to his and my opinions > >on the state of the 90's are others on this list who just love their > >little tele-elmarit's. > > Mark > > You might want to re-read Erwin's comments on the skinny Tele-Elmarit. > He's not nearly as negative as you seem to think he is. It is arguably > Leica's finest 90mm lens until the current 2.8/90. > > I have a skinny Tele-Elmarit. I have a collapsible 4/90, which I love. I > have a current 2.8/90 Elmarit. I have a current 2/90. I have used every > Leica permutation of the 90mm length, including a brief spate with a > three-element 4/90. I love 'em all, as this is, mayhaps, my first choice > in focal lengths. But the current 2.8/90 IS the best -- my shots of the > late and lamented Charming Cindy proved that to me! > > Marc He infers the one before it was better and it what the current is based on. I had read the current was made with NASA Specs and money. Mark