Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bryant, I know I responded to your question, but I can't resist adding an additional bit of advice. This advice is very good, but too often ignored. Select a good film/developer combination, and stay with it for a while. Ignore people that tell you to try all sorts of odd combinations. Do some tests based on the kind of work that you do, and keep work samples and good records for future reference. Lot's of good photographers used simple combinations like Plus-X or Tri-X and D-76 1/1 for years with good results. Many images are ruined by screwing up while trying the latest or most esoteric developers. If you stick to a simple combination you achieve a high level of consistency, and consistency is your best friend in processing. While rambling, I would like to risk flak by saying that many film processors are always seeking the finest possible grain. Slow films and fine-grain developers. However, I don't mind a certain amount of grain. If the image has a lot of detail, grain is less evident. When there is a lot of detail in an image, acutance becomes more important (I believe) than grain, lot's more important. Also, slow films can be contrasty, and the result can be unwelcome. And, unless you have lot's of light, or can use a tripond and long exposure, depth of field, or worse, camera motion can be a problem. I always get more photos I like--and that print well--with 100 film than with 25 film. I could go on and on, but be above should produce an adequate and satisfactory response. I will sit back and await replies from those who will probably disagree. Happy 1999 to all, Joe Stephenson ++++++++ Bryant wrote: [cut] Any other advice (careful, I've secretly been listening and I will consider the source) may be appreciated. Kind regards, Bryant