Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re[2]: [Leica] Musings on the role of photography and a ques
From: Peterson_Art@hq.navsea.navy.mil
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 19:38:52 -0500

     
     Eric Welch (below) wrote, "You have to go with what you see."  And I 
     simply repeat it here because I can't imagine a better way of saying 
     something with which I totally agree and which, if you think about its 
     implications, is as helpful and important as any bit of advice on the 
     LUG in my experience.  Among those implications are that we first must 
     look, look, look in order to see.
     
     Art Peterson
     Alexandria, VA
     

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: [Leica] Musings on the role of photography and a questio
Author:  leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us at Internet
Date:    12/30/98 11:39 AM


>As I'm writing this, I have on my coffee table (silly name for a low table) 
>a copy of a book of Ansel Adam's photos and another by Eugene Smith which 
>strikes this same juxtaposition.  
     
Actually, of all the photojournalists (The Trash Can School of Photography 
as Ansel Adams like to tease them) W. Eugene Smith is probably not the one 
to contrast against Adams. Adams often mentioned Smith as the best example 
of the good side of photojournalism. Smith often used beauty to draw 
attention to his subject. Sebastiao Salgado does the same.
     
Adams had a war going with Steichen, because, partly, Steichen drove Adams' 
friend, photo historian Beumont Newhall, out of the Museum of Modern Art and 
took over. Steichen was a believer in the story-telling angle to 
photography. What the photo communicated is more important than how it does 
it. Rather than seeing the value of both.
     
Cariter-Bresson criticized Adams and Weston for "photographing rocks and 
trees when the world is falling apart" or something like that. People who 
are passionate about what they do, and believe in its value very strongly, 
are likely to fall into this exclusionistic trap. Otherwise, they probably 
wouldn't care all that much about what they do. No?
     
You have to go with what you see as your desire to tell a story. I'm sure 
what you've become interested in is not high on most people's lists. But who 
cares? Go with it. People often change their approaches as they mature. Not 
that it can't go the other way as one matures. I sometimes think I'm tired 
of the photojournalistic genre and want to get into the broader world of 
editorial/commercial shooting. The kind of work that Ernst Haas did, or Pete 
Turner or Jay Meisel. That looks like fun. (There's sure a lot more money 
there!)
- -- 
     
Eric Welch
St. Joseph, MO
http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch
     
How do I set my laser printer on stun?