Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Peter, I think you're confusing lens design versus the resulting image. What you describe is a way that Leica would design a rangefinder lens. That point would make sense in that an SLR lens would be designed differently. However, since I posted the original comment that sparked this issue, I must clarify what I meant by the 3d effect. It is the appearance that the subject in focus stands out from the surrounding background and foreground. Since this is a 2d medium, that effect is no small feat. I would rather believe that the 3d effect has to do with the contrast characteristics of a given lens. As I mentioned earlier, the lenses I see this effect are my R series (35 summicron 1st gen, 85 summilux, 35-70 ROM). I also see them in some of my M lenses (35 summilux aspherical, 75 summilux). John At 12:16 PM 12/26/98 -0800, Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: > > George, > > What you say it partially true. The fact is Rangefinder use 3 >focusing points and create what is called "tunneling." You set the focusing >points to achieve a perspective of an image when in focus. The older >M-lenses where also designed with this in mind. Some refer to it as a "3-D >effect" others refer to it as "rounding." Call it what you like, but it is >the effect of the Rangefinder versus an SLR. > > Peter K > >> George Huczek wrote: >> >> At 12:00 PM 22/12/98 +0000, John wrote: >> One thing I really like about the Leica lenses is their ability to >> render the in-focus subjects nearly 3d in its differentiation from >> the background. I don't know if this is true with Nikkors. >> >> I've heard this so many times that I'm not sure anymore if this is a >> LUG myth or if there is some truth to it. Older SM Leica lenses may >> have been designed optically to bring this about intentionally, but >> is there any truth to this for newer lenses, or is it just part of >> the Leica mystique? >> >