Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As a Rollei 6008i user as well as Leica R6.2, I was at least pleased to see the position/recognition awarded the Rollei. Lets hear it for the R6.2, as well as the R8!!! Happy yuletide from Australia, everyone!! - -----Original Message----- From: Eric Welch <ewelch@ponyexpress.net> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Wednesday, 23 December 1998 14:42 Subject: Re: [Leica] "standard camera" >>And the 25 cameras mentioned in the article are? > >1: Deardorf 5x7 >2: F5 >3: Canon EOS-3 (just came out! And no R8? Something's wrong here...) >4: Rolleiflex 6008 >5: A "G8" flatbed camera - whatever that is. >6: Leica M6 TTL >7: A monorail view camera (too many close together to single one out? Cowards!) >8: (Tie with 9) Mamiya RZ67 Pro II >9: (Tie with 8) Mamiya 7 >10: Hasselblad 503CW with CW Winder >11: Contax G2 (Give me a break!) >12: Wista 45 DXII >13: Pentax 645N >14: Hasselblad Xpan >15: Nikon N90s >16: Minolta Maxxum 9 (the new pro camera just introduced - Hey, basis for >an R9? It's got stuff the F5 and EOS1n don't have!) >17: Tachihara 4x5 (tie with 18) >18: Calumet Wood Field >19: Fujica GA 645 Professional >20: Minolta HTsi >21: Pentax 67 >22: Seagull WWSC-120 TLR >23: Canon ELPH >24: Nikon Coolpix 900 >25: Olympus Stylus Epic. > >I have to say I don't disagree with a lot of choices here, but it wouldn't >be my list. >-- > >Eric Welch >St. Joseph, MO >http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch > >Better to understand a little than to misunderstand a lot