Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 18:50 22/12/98 EST, you wrote : >Hi guys, > >In a Section 301 case, the Commerce Department and the Office of the United >States Trade Representative (USTR) make up a target list of goods that will be >subject to the addtional punitive duty. The list can contain any items, >whether they are related to the items that were the subject of the original >trade complaint or not. Usually, though, the goods targetted for additional >duty bear some reemblance to the subject of th original trade case so that the >"proper parties are punished" so to speak. Therefore, while it is possible >that Leicas and other photographic equipment may be subject to aditional >duties because of a dispute over bananas, it is more likely tat when/if a >target list is compiled, it will aim more at agricultural products. > > >Mike Swiek > ############ Don't worry about that. "C'est de la gesticulation diplomatique". At each time the u.s. balance of trade is in the red, Yanks take the 301 section out of the drawer. They prefer their bananas instead of european bananas.Once more, a smutty story coming out the bathroom of the oval office... Dominique Pellissier