Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Kevin, well said! I have my share of lovely but unimaginative images (ho hum, another snow-capped mountain reflected in a lake). I also have my share of more experimental images which I am very pleased with, but which I hold back some, because they don't seem to affect others as they do me. Maybe sometime, I'll put these various still lifes and found objects on my web site just for the fun of it, to see if maybe 1-2% of the visitors see more than just a image of someone's freshly mown lawn, or a dog's rubber ball! I've been very fortunate to have visited many faraway places at a relatively early age; I know all too well how easy it would be to become jaded, with the exotic becoming commonplace; to miss all the small details that enrich the experience, and focus on the typical postcard image! Jeff Segawa See my photography online at http://www.netone.com/~segawa PS: What ever became of the "Day In The Life"-type project that was tossed about here-has anyone decided on a specific date? - -----Original Message----- From: Khoffberg <khoffberg@email.msn.com> >Galen makes this distinction in his reference to "mature" and "immature" >images. The later are those that have never seldom been seen before (like >the first ever picture of a snow leopard for example). For some chunk of >Galen's career, he's had the advantage of being places others have not, so >making immature images was pretty easy. All this finally brings me back to >your point. Making profound images in your backyard (sometimes literally) >is wonderfully challenging because you really need to strip away the >apparent familiarity to see something fresh and new. As I understood Gib's >and Doug's point, that was what they felt was missing in some of Galen's >work from more exotic locales.