Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]James, Historically, the opinion you state is not true. The first focal length for the Leica was the 50mm, for the screw mount and for the M bayonet. It was not until the M2 appeared that it became 'natural' to think that the 35mm lens could also be a 'standard' focal length on the Leica. Previously, the user needed a special viewfinder or a special goggled lens to use 35mm lenses on Leicas. From the M2 onwards, the 35mm became a favourite for M users because of its ultracompact size and very easy management, particularly for the precision of focusing at that focal length (and wider), which, even today, is much easier to obtain with the M than with any manual focus SLR. The 35mm Summicron + M are a 'natural' couple. On a manual focus SLR, and the R is such a system, the 50mm is easier to use with precision, especially when light gets scarce, while wider lenses in low light are sometimes frustrating to focus. That might explain why a lot of users, and I am one of those, consider the 50mm more of a 'standard' focal length than the 35mm on such SLRs. Also, the Leica M has for various reasons become very successful with photo journalists and their type of photography: pictures of people and their environment. The 35mm (or 28mm) focal length is easier to use for that type of photography than longer lenses. It is more flexible, gives larger depth of field and allows the photographer to shoot from within a group. Nowadays, the 21-35mm zooms + fill-in flash on AF SLRs are dominant for those applications. The M system with w/a from 21 to 35mm can sometimes compete in that environment for obvious reasons (size, silence, etc). The R system, deprived from any such zoom, is a bit out of that niche. It seems obvious to me that the M is at its best between 21 and 50mm, while manual focus SLRs are easier to use from 50mm on. For people with mixed equipment, it seems reasonable to devote the M to the wider angles of view, and devote the SLR to zooms and narrower angles of view. The 50mm is where the systems really overlap. Alan. Dr James Harper wrote: > > A recent message (I cannot now find it) said something on the lines that > the 35mm lens tended to be standard for an M camera, but it was the 50mm > for the R. > > This was very interesting, if generally true. Can anyone suggest why this > might be so? Might it be because you can work closer with an M? > > Regards. > > JH