Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Contax & Leica
From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 07:48:01 -0800

At a trade show the Hasselblad Reps were discussing lenses, and the one they
noted as being the "sharpest in the system" (their words not mine) was the
CF 180mm lens.

- -----Original Message-----
From: Andre Jean Quintal [mailto:megamax@abacom.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 1998 5:07 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] Contax & Leica


At 12:45 -0600 14/12/98, Eric Welch wrote:
>> The lens that was sharpest in the Hassy series is
>>the 180mm.  Now that lens is tack sharp.!!!
>
>Wonder how their new 300 2.8 will stack up? :-)
[ . . . ]

I had always been under the impression that the
Hasselblad CF100 Planar was considered their
most accurate and highest resolution lens . . .,
generally speaking, with a very desireable M.T.F. curve .

1 / Do I understand the notion "sharpness"
in a wrong way ??? (though i know the CF180
"rates up" with the few "high performance"
lenses now available "off the shelf" ; it remains
a more than 2X normal lens, a lot by my usual
preferences over the years ). . .

2 / Is there some "chart" or system to help rate
the ACUTANCE / EDGE DEFINITION
of a given lens, objectively ?
Or RELATIVE to others designs ?
Would this relate to some "threshold" point
in a M.T.F. curve, even subjective ?

Thank you,

Andre Jean Quintal


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

It ain't easy being a Frog !
                        Kermit