Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 20:28 14/12/98 -0000, "Dr James Harper" wrote : >I wrote, on 10 December: "I subscribed to this for about 10 years in the 70's and 80's, and even once bought a job lot of several hundred from earlier years. But I must confess that, apart from the technical stuff at the back, I found too many of the articles turgid, funereal in tone, and sometimes simply boring. There were some good ones too, of course." For the record, and the archives, all reponses to my request for views were critical. No-one came forward to defend it. Such a pity, really. It must cost Leica a lot of money, and make little or no profit. I recommend it to insomniacs. It has no side effects, except on Leica. ########### As we say in french :"Tout ce qui est excessif n'a pas d'importance" (everything that is excessive has no importance). Dominique Pellissier