Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Peter, You seem to miss my point. You are most certainly entitled to your opinion, as are others. I am only pointing that out. Your tone seems to imply that no opinion other than yours is invalid. I hapen to like a "natural" look, so I don't use polarizers either. Ken > > Baloney! Use the new E-6 films and you'll understand why kodak went with > E-6 vs. K-14. > (Physics aside!) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) [SMTP:peterk@lucent.com] > Sent: Monday, December 14, 1998 1:50 PM > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > Subject: RE: [Leica] I for one am glad Kodachrome is dead or > dying.[!] > > Ken, > > I thought the forum was for photography. Why am I not entitled to an > opinion? You call it a high horse, but I think like many today you > attempt > to criticize me for what I say to reduce the effectiveness of truthful > comments. Ashame.... > > Peter K > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee, Ken [mailto:ken.lee@hbc.com] > Sent: Monday, December 14, 1998 10:00 AM > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > Subject: RE: [Leica] I for one am glad Kodachrome is dead or dying.[!] > > > Peter, > > Please get off your high horse! Tastes differ. For my tastes (and some > others) most (if not all) of the current E6 films are over the top. The > colours are too exaggerated and saturated. The film has too much contrast, > I > just don't like the result. This is my opinion so it cannot be wrong any > more than your opinion can be wrong. This forum is for exchanging ideas > not > for proving who is the biggest... > > Ken > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) [SMTP:peterk@lucent.com] > > Sent: Monday, December 14, 1998 11:34 AM > > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > > Subject: RE: [Leica] I for one am glad Kodachrome is dead or > > dying.[!] > > > > Baloney! Use the new E-6 films and you'll understand why kodak went > with > > E-6 vs. K-14. > > (Physics aside!) > > > > -----Original Message----- >