Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] I for one am glad Kodachrome is dead or dying.[!]
From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 08:34:11 -0800

Baloney!  Use the new E-6 films and you'll understand why kodak went with
E-6 vs. K-14.  
(Physics aside!)

- -----Original Message-----
From: Eric Welch [mailto:ewelch@ponyexpress.net]
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 1998 6:24 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] I for one am glad Kodachrome is dead or dying.[!]


>Prettier palate??  Poppycock!!  Kodachrome reproduces purple as blue, so
>what palate?
>Finer grain...Nope, not anymore.  New T-grain emulsions in Ektachromes blow
>away archane kodachrap.

Color balance has nothing to do with E6 or K14, it has to do with the
current formula for the emulsion. Simple.

As for finer grain, do you know what color couplers are? E-6 has them in
the emulsion, K14 does not. Always will make Kodachrome potentially
superior to E6, because the emulsion can be thinner, the key to higher
sharpness and finer grain. Basic physics. 
- -- 

Eric Welch
St. Joseph, MO
http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch

"...nostalgia ain't what it used to be." ...unknown