Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>legendary 100 2.8 APO. . it was very very good, but not as memorable, in my >experience, >as the Hasselblad 150 CF Sonnar >This is not a good comparison for obvious reasonsThe comparison was not >>intended to be between these two lenses. . What I meant was that the 150 was memorable. . .it was impressively sharp and contrasty lens (a later version was not so). . . The 100 was not memorable. But, as I mentioned, it has been my 30+ year experience with perhaps many systems and lenses that quality does vary between different examples of the same (model/make) of lens.