Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01BE2742.920E7B60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Tina - I don't purport to know anything about the legality. However, I would at the least post a notice on your site that it is not in any way connected to Boylinks, and I would seriously consider finding someway to either rename or isolate your site. That last thing you want is for someone, someday, to say that you were connected with, promoting, kiddie porn..... -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Tina Manley Sent: Sunday, December 13, 1998 11:32 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] Legal links Dear LUGnuts: I have already posted this question on PhotoPro and they are debating it furiously. I would love to have your opinion also. What can or should I do? Someone alerted me that my web site was linked to something called Boylinks at: http://www.fpc.net/boylinks/picture.html I sent them an e-mail and asked them to remove the link. They sent the following reply: Dear Tina Manley, Boylinks provides links to sites that are already in the public domain and provide information (including images) of boys. For this reason your site qualified for inclusion. I must point out that while your site remains in the public domain I am unable to consider removing this link. yours sincerely, Blinker While my photographs on the site are copyrighted, the entire website is not. What are my rights? Can they do this? Thanks - Tina PhotoPro seems about evenly divided between "free speech"(they can say whatever they want) and "libel"(they can't say anything about you that you don't want them to). Since the site doesn't actually copy my photos or the web site but only points to it, it isn't really a copyright issue; however, I don't want my site linked to "Boylinks"! What should I do? Thanks for your help - Tina Tina Manley, ASMP http://www.photogs.com/manley/index.html http://members.tripod.com/~Tina_Manley/index.html - ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01BE2742.920E7B60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR> </HEAD> <BODY> <DIV><SPAN class=3D270301514-14121998><FONT color=3D#000000 = face=3D"Times New Roman"=20 size=3D3>Tina - I don't purport to know anything about the legality. = However, I=20 would at the least post a notice on your site that it is not in any way=20 connected to Boylinks, and I would seriously consider finding someway to = either=20 rename or isolate your site. That last thing you want is for someone, = someday,=20 to say that you were connected with, promoting, kiddie=20 porn.....</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: = 5px"> <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman"=20 size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20 owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us=20 [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]<B>On Behalf Of</B> = Tina=20 Manley<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December 13, 1998 11:32 = PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20 leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Leica] Legal=20 links<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>Dear LUGnuts:<BR><BR>I have already posted = this=20 question on PhotoPro and they are debating it furiously. I = would love=20 to have your opinion also. What can or should I = do?<BR><BR>Someone=20 alerted me that my web site was linked to something called Boylinks=20 at:<BR><BR><FONT color=3D#0000ff><U><A=20 href=3D"http://www.fpc.net/boylinks/picture.html" eudora =3D=20 autourl>http://www.fpc.net/boylinks/picture.html</A></FONT></U> = <BR><BR>I=20 sent them an e-mail and asked them to remove the link. They sent the = following reply:<BR><BR>Dear Tina Manley,<BR>Boylinks provides links = to=20 sites that are already in the public domain and <BR>provide = information=20 (including images) of boys. For this reason your site <BR>qualified = for=20 inclusion.<BR>I must point out that while your site remains in the = public=20 domain I am <BR>unable to consider removing this link.<BR>yours=20 sincerely,<BR>Blinker<BR><BR><BR>While my photographs on the site = are=20 copyrighted, the entire website is not. What are my rights? Can they = do=20 this?<BR><BR>Thanks -<BR><BR>Tina<BR><BR>PhotoPro seems about evenly = divided=20 between "free speech"(they can say whatever they want) and = "libel"(they can't say anything about you that you don't = want them=20 to). Since the site doesn't actually copy my photos or the web = site=20 but only points to it, it isn't really a copyright issue; however, I = don't=20 want my site linked to "Boylinks"! What should I=20 do?<BR><BR>Thanks for your help -<BR><BR>Tina<BR><BR><BR> <DIV>Tina Manley, ASMP</DIV><BR> <DIV><A href=3D"http://www.photogs.com/manley/index.html" EUDORA =3D = AUTOURL>http://www.photogs.com/manley/index.html</A></DIV><A=20 href=3D"http://members.tripod.com/~Tina_Manley/index.html" EUDORA = =3D=20 AUTOURL>http://members.tripod.com/~Tina_Manley/index.html</A>=20 </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01BE2742.920E7B60--