Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My brother (Hubert, still remember him) urges me to go mainstream as it is infinitely more relaxed than trying to unearth the real story about anything Leica-ish. Still in my heart I am a Startrek believer: exploration without prejudice is the mission of any Vulcan. So here it is: On bubbles in glass: Bubbles are unavoidable in the manufacture of glass, but they come in classes: we have very small bubbles and larger ones, we have a low concentration or a higher concentration per volume unit of glass. The Schott catalogue identifies four classes of the incidence of bubbles, from zero to three. The zero class has an extremely low amount of bubbles per volume unit and class three has a higher amount. The designer then can choose beforehand what type of optical glass he needs and how high an amount of bubbles he can handle in his design. Generally bubbles are optically absolutely uninteresting from a performance view. Cosmetically it is a different matter. We might see bubbles and feel insecure. Still the effect of the presence of bubbles on performance is to be measured in promilles. Bubbles can be annoying and performance degrading: this will happen when the bubbes are in glass that is very close to the focal plane. Any respectible designer knows about this and will ensure that he selects glass that will not degrade the image beyond the tolerated optical aberrations that is. So do not worry. Bubbles are optically harmless when the desiger is a responsable girl or guy, but may be unsettling emotionally. But remember Cindy Crawford and the small beauty spot on her face? On coating. Some light is always refleced from any surface. We know about that and we can control it. If we apply a very thin film on a glass surface we can reduce reflections. The "thickness" of this thin film is generally 1/4 of the relevant wavelength, very small that is. If we use one layer of coating to a 1/4 wavelength of light in the part of the spectrum of light in which suppression has been chosen (mostly the green-yellow area) we talk about a single layer coating. In an optical system with many elements it is not advisable to apply this coating to all surfaces if we want to have neutral transmission. Therefore some coating is yellowish in tint to compensate. High refraction glass also demands yellow coating to compensate the inherent blue absorbing characteristic of dense glass. As the single layer can only correct for one wavelength, we need more layers if we are to compensate for more wavelenghts. So multicoating can stack up to nine layers of single thin film coatings. This we call multi-layer coating. The coating must be adjusted to the angle of incidence of the predominant light falling onto the glass. A double layer coating used for the front glass of wide angle lenses ( light incidence at large angles) will b green tinged. The colour of individual lens surfaces is a carefully designed composite of refractive angles of incidence and many other reflective characteristics of the glass employed. Most manufacturers use multi-layer coating by various names. But be aware taht a bad design will never become a good one becuase of MLC. Multicoating is the same as multi-layer coating. BTW. Erwin