Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] consolidating my photo system....
From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@euronet.be>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 07:58:34 +0100

Hi Francesco,

It would seem to me that for the type of photography you describe the M
system is ideal. That is also why I have become an M devotee. When I walk
around with my camera, whether here in Belgium or when travelling, I very
rarely miss a longer lens than the 135mm. In fact, for street photography the
vast majority of my images are taken with the wide angle lenses (the 35mm is
my standard lens on the M6, the 50mm on the M3). Another factor to consider
is weight: when I was in Madrid this summer, I could really feel the
difference between walking around all day with an M system in my bag vs. an
SLR system.

I have kept one SLR (Pentax PZ1P) for the odd occasion where I need a long
lens or autofocus or macro shots of bugs or flowers. But it sees little use
on a daily basis. Of course, knowing that the resale value of this camera is
relatively low makes it easier to justify keeping it "just in case". If it
were a Leica R, this would be more difficult. That is why I sold my
Hasselblad last year.

Nathan

Francesco wrote:

> LUG friends:
>
> 99% of my photography, now that I am out of the erotic world,
> will be travel and street, and the occasional landscape, nature,
> or portrait.  I think the M and R lenses I own are the best available
> in each system,  and I am happy with either system, but
> uncomfortable holding both and using only one.  I am about
> even in terms of what I still need to complete each system.  If I
> keep the M I still need a 24 ASPH and the 90 APO when it
> arrives, and if I keep the R, I still need an R8 and one of these
> lens combos:
>
> (1)  24/2.8, 50/2.
> (2)  19/2.8, 35/1.4, 50/2.
> (3)  19/2.8, 35/1.4, 80/1.4.
> (4)  35/1.4, 80/1.4.
>
> I personally, am now again leaning towards the R system, mainly
> for the lens variety, but I wish Leica would rejuvenate their wide angles
> for R like they have for M.   I would appreciate any comments,
> suggestions, ideas, trade offers, etc.  As soon as I make a decision,
> the partial system I decide not to keep will be for sale or trade.
>
> In other words, I will probably have the following gear for sale, instead
> of the R lenses I was advertising earlier:
>
> FS:  Leica M6HM, 35/2 ASPH, 50/2, TA-Rapidwinder, M-Hangrip,
> all with boxes and booklets, all in EX+ to MINT- condition.
>
> WTB:  MINT or NEW R8, R lenses listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Francesco
> fls@san.rr.com



- --
Nathan Wajsman
Overijse, Belgium

Photography page:  http://members.tripod.com/~belgiangator/index.html
Motorcycle page:  http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/downs/1704/index.html